Skip to content 
Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) continues to draw global attention as a hub for innovative financial services. Over the years, it has built a strong reputation by offering a stable legal environment, robust regulatory oversight, and advanced infrastructure for businesses looking to tap into emerging markets in the region. This appeal grows stronger with virtual assets, which use distributed ledger technology (DLT) to store and transfer value. Firms providing these services, often called virtual assets service providers in DIFC, can find a welcoming yet carefully supervised environment. That is, if they meet the standards set by the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA).
In this article, we explore how DIFC, under the DFSA’s leadership, has created a framework that supports virtual assets. We will look at the types of tokens involved, the expected licensing categories, the technology and governance standards. On top of that, we will walk through how the application process unfolds. By the end, you should have a comprehensive view of the DIFC approach to regulating virtual assets. You will know what a business can expect if it decides to establish in this leading financial district.
Defining virtual assets service providers
In many jurisdictions, virtual assets service providers (VASPs) are businesses that manage, exchange, or safeguard digital assets on behalf of others. These might include crypto exchanges, brokerage platforms, operators of automated teller machines for crypto conversions, or even advisory services focusing on tokenised assets. Virtual assets service providers in the DIFC must follow enhanced anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing (CTF) rules, given the potential for misuse of digital currencies.
Within DIFC, the DFSA has been phasing in a digital assets regime. Firms engaging in financial services tied to these assets will need to secure the relevant DFSA authorisations. The key phrase here is “for and on behalf of another person,”. This means that activities such as mining or individual trading typically remain outside direct regulation. However, if that activity becomes large-scale or aggregated, it may come under oversight.
Overview of the DIFC digital assets framework
Some steps have already been completed, such as finalising rules around security tokens. Additional guidelines are expected, covering areas like utility tokens, exchange tokens, and stablecoins. These expansions will form what the DFSA calls the DIFC Digital Assets Regime. Once fully operational, the framework should provide a comprehensive set of standards for all kinds of digital assets, whether they behave like securities, mediums of exchange, or pegged instruments (for instance, stablecoins).
For now, a large focus has been on what the DFSA calls security tokens. These are tokens that confer rights and obligations akin to shares, debentures, or futures. Following the “Howey Test,” the DFSA notes that if a token involves an investment of money in a common enterprise with an expectation of profit from third-party efforts, it is essentially an investment. This approach helps regulators identify tokens that must comply with established securities rules, including disclosure requirements and potential prospectus obligations.
What qualifies as a security token in DIFC
According to the DFSA, a security token is a token whose nature, purpose, or effect mimics that of traditional securities. For instance, it could provide profit-sharing or ownership interest in a venture. The DFSA takes a hybrid approach, inviting applicants to do a self-assessment of how their token meets or diverges from characteristics of an investment. Ultimately, the regulator will decide whether the proposed token is a specified investment under its rules.
By categorising certain tokens as securities, the DFSA brings them under established financial laws. This offers clarity. If a token behaves like equity or debt, it must comply with rules similar to conventional offerings in shares or bonds. On the other hand, tokens that serve only as payment instruments or mediums of exchange might fall under different segments of the digital assets regime.
Our working hours: Monday to Friday, 9 AM – 6 PM GMT+4
Activities likely included under the new regime
Although the DFSA’s digital assets regime is being introduced in phases, several activities are already expected to be regulated, including:
- Dealing as principal or agent in accepted virtual assets
- Managing virtual assets on behalf of clients
- Arranging deals in investments if those investments qualify as virtual assets
- Operating trading platforms, often referred to as multilateral trading facilities (MTFs) or alternative trading systems (ATS)
- Marketing accepted virtual assets to potential investors
- Providing or arranging custody, ensuring tokens are stored securely
- Advising on the purchase or sale of digital assets
For now, privacy-focused or fully anonymous tokens remain prohibited. Certain stablecoins or utility tokens may be regulated under a future update. Many watch for the DFSA’s next move, which should lay out guidelines on utility tokens, exchange tokens, and stablecoins.
Trading solutions for security tokens
Under existing DFSA rules, exchanges and trading platforms that handle conventional securities can now extend their operations to security tokens. This includes authorised market institutions (AMIs) and entities licensed to operate alternate trading systems, known in DIFC as MTFs or OTFs. By adopting this approach, the DFSA ensures that the same risk management, AML, and market integrity requirements are applied consistently to both old and new forms of assets.
However, prospective ATS or MTF operators must pay particular attention to additional know-your-customer (KYC) rules and technology compliance. Virtual asset trades require secure monitoring, with no tolerance for anonymity or obscured transactions. The DFSA wants to see that the platform can manage the unique risks of distributed ledger transactions, including how rights and obligations are documented and whether the system can cope with forks or other network events.
Building strong IT infrastructure
One core aspect of the regime is technology governance. The DFSA expects virtual assets service providers in DIFC to follow best practices for network security, data storage, and transaction integrity. Whether the service operates an exchange or simply provides custody, it must:
- Demonstrate that participants accessing the platform are fully identified
- Ensure that the distributed ledger can track and discharge rights and obligations properly
- Plan for unexpected events such as protocol upgrades or chain splits
- Run annual, comprehensive IT audits, conducted by independent experts to confirm the platform’s reliability and safety
"This emphasis on third-party auditing helps maintain confidence. In a market where trust can be undermined by hacking and fraud, such scrutiny is vital."
Alternate trading systems in DIFC
An alternative trading system (ATS) in DIFC can match buyers and sellers of securities under non-discretionary rules (MTFs) or discretionary rules (OTFs). While these are typically used for large or specialised trades among institutional participants, the introduction of the digital assets regime means that such facilities can also list or trade security tokens. For some, launching an ATS that caters to institutional token transactions could be an appealing route.
Historically, the DIFC has not seen a large number of ATS registrations, but the DFSA anticipates that more will emerge for security tokens. Some may be dedicated entirely to tokenised offerings or secondary markets for digital instruments. These facilities must keep trading transparent, ensure that no undisclosed conflicts of interest arise, and maintain continuity in the face of potential blockchain disruptions.
Wallet services and custody
For many clients, a key question is how to store digital assets securely. Digital wallets can be cold (hardware-based, offline) or hot (online, connected to the internet). In DIFC, providing or arranging custody is regulated, which means an entity storing private keys for clients must get a licence to Provide Custody. The DFSA recognises that not all users want self-custody, especially institutions that prefer an overseen environment.
A VASP might hold client assets using its own private keys in a controlled DLT address, or it could facilitate external wallets. In either scenario, it must comply with client asset rules, including record-keeping and investor protection. If an ATS or MTF operator also holds client money to facilitate trades, it will be subject to client money requirements. Such operators can handle security tokens, but must maintain base and expense-based capital in accordance with DFSA rules.
Get the most relevant information about business life in Dubai
Token issuance and token funds
If a token is deemed a security, a public sale could equate to an initial public offering (IPO). The DFSA applies the same prospectus obligations, meaning any white paper or similar document must contain disclosures similar to those for conventional securities. The DFSA allows certain exemptions, for instance if a sale targets high-net-worth or institutional participants investing more than 100,000 US dollars. Fractional ownership that dips below this threshold could lose that exempt status.
Funds can also be tokenised, representing interests in a collective investment scheme. The DFSA will treat these tokens as fund units, subject to the same guidelines as standard fund distributions. A prospective manager must show that it can protect investor rights, evaluate the underlying assets, and manage liquidity. If the fund invests in other crypto tokens, the offering documents must outline the associated risks and any caps on crypto allocations.
Approvals from the DFSA
Virtual assets service providers in DIFC must get DFSA approval, which starts with determining their licence category. The DIFC divides licences from Category 1 to Category 4, depending on the complexity and risk:
- Category 1 is for deposit-taking banks.
- Category 2 suits market makers and credit providers.
- Category 3 includes matched-principal brokers and asset managers.
- Category 4 is for lower-risk activities like advising or arranging.
An ATS typically fits Category 4, although it carries some unique conditions around capital and client money. A matched-principal broker might need Category 3A, while a full portfolio manager might need Category 3C. The highest risk category is 1, which is rarely pursued by crypto start-ups given it involves deposit-taking.
"The DFSA urges applicants to consult carefully before deciding how to structure their business model, as it is a decision that shapes the entire future of the business."
Staffing and capital expectations
The DFSA imposes a high bar for governance. A typical VASP in DIFC must:
- Appoint a board of directors with robust policies, ensuring that the chair is a non-executive director
- Designate a senior executive officer (SEO) who has over 10 years of relevant experience and resides in the UAE
- Employ a finance officer (FO), potentially outsourced or at the parent company, but still meeting DFSA standards
- Have a technology head or chief technology officer with strong IT expertise, since operating DLT-based platforms is a complex task
- Maintain a compliance officer (CO) with at least 10 years of experience in oversight roles, living in the UAE
- Have a money-laundering reporting officer (MLRO), which can be merged with the CO role if properly qualified
- Engage external and internal auditors, plus an independent IT auditor for yearly reviews
Capital levels vary by licence category, but the base capital for Category 4 can be as low as 10,000 US dollars, while Category 3 might require 500,000, and Category 2 can reach 2 million. However, the final figure depends on three capital components: base, risk-based, and expense-based. The DFSA chooses whichever is higher, meaning a start-up can face a bigger requirement if it projects substantial operating expenses or if it holds client assets.
Application process and timeline
Firms that wish to be virtual assets service providers in DIFC start with an introductory call involving DIFC officials and the DFSA. Next, they prepare a detailed regulatory business plan (RBP) describing their model, the tokens in question, compliance measures, corporate structure, and proposed management. Once the DFSA offers initial feedback, the applicant compiles a comprehensive dossier of policies, KYC forms for key individuals, AML frameworks, and risk management plans.
After that, a formal application is lodged, usually followed by a 7–10 business day check to confirm completeness. The DFSA then begins a thorough 90–120 day review, involving clarifications, interviews, and possibly additional data requests. If the DFSA sees merit, it issues an in-principle approval, at which point the firm must establish a legal entity in DIFC, open bank accounts, deposit share capital, and finalise other conditions. A final submission leads to the financial services permission being granted.
Total costs vary. For instance, an ATS dealing in security tokens pays an application fee of about 150,000 US dollars, along with annual licence fees around 100,000. Data protection registration and office rental must also be considered. The DFSA requires each entity to maintain a physical office in DIFC, with at least 80 square feet per visa if not using a business centre.
-
The DFSA enforces an annual IT audit, requiring VASPs to demonstrate secure handling of tokens, robust governance, and preparedness for scenarios like forks
-
Capital requirements vary by licence category, determined by whichever is higher among base, risk-based, or expense-based capital
-
Once approved, a DIFC-based VASP can serve a wide market, including potential cross-border clients, subject to relevant local marketing rules
DIFC cost considerations
Leasing an office in DIFC can be expensive, though rates differ among buildings. Premium properties near the Gate might rent for 55 US dollars per square foot, while more modest offices could start at 35,000 US dollars per year. Additional overheads include data protection fees (1,250 US dollars to register and 500 annually), plus the cost of each employee visa (around 1,500 US dollars, plus a deposit).
When factoring in capital obligations, technology investments, auditing, professional indemnity insurance, and staff salaries, the initial outlay can be substantial. On the other hand, operating from a respected financial hub often proves beneficial. Institutional clients appreciate the thorough DFSA supervision, while strategic partners value the region’s proximity to large markets.
Why firms can serve the wider UAE from DIFC
A 2021 law clarified that DIFC entities may provide services outside the centre, as long as the primary operations occur within their DIFC premises. Marketing and promotion can similarly extend beyond the free zone, subject to local laws. Some activities, such as distributing funds to local clients, might call for a passporting procedure with relevant regulators. However, a well-structured DIFC firm can certainly handle cross-border dealings, bridging multiple markets.
This arrangement helps many businesses, enabling them to capture opportunities throughout the UAE or beyond, while still benefiting from DIFC’s common law system and the DFSA’s international reputation. For instance, a token fund established in DIFC can potentially solicit capital from Dubai or Abu Dhabi residents, once it meets the required marketing approvals.
